texture, textile, fabric, cotton, cloth, textiles, fabrics, textile, textile, textile, textile, textile, fabric, fabric, fabric, fabric, fabric, cotton, cotton, cotton, cloth. Storing a repair archive: fabric, notes and photos kept legible
Photo by Roses_Street on Pixabay

Reviews

Part of Garment repair case studies: one documented coat, and your own

Storing a repair archive: fabric, notes and photos kept legible

Garment repair case studies storage: keeping fabric samples, notes and images together, how to label so the mark survives, what cold storage does for photographs.

An archive of repair records fails in a specific way: the materials survive and the identification does not. Loose labels fall off, ink fades, and a box of unmarked fabric squares is indistinguishable from a bag of scrap. Labeling is the part to get right.

What to take away

  • The label has to outlast the sample, and be removable if you need to renumber.
  • Keep the sample, the note and the image together, or keep an index that links them.
  • Cold storage genuinely extends photographic life, with one condensation precaution.
  • Throw out anything you cannot identify. An unlabeled sample is not evidence.

Labeling that survives

Institutions solved this problem, and their criteria are worth borrowing. The National Park Service leaflet on labeling museum objects sets out what a labeling material must do. It must be as chemically stable as possible, age well, resist marking inks on porous materials, and come off if the object is renumbered or the number moves.

The Service replaced cellulose nitrate lacquer with an acrylic copolymer because the older material curled, flaked, and lost numbers.

You are not lacquering fabric squares. The transferable criteria are: stable ink, a label that will still be readable in a decade, and a system where the number can be changed without destroying the sample.

In practice that means a number written on acid-free card, tied to the sample with cotton thread, and an index that maps numbers to records.

Keep the three parts linked

Every entry has three physical or digital parts: the fabric sample, the written note, and the images. Losing any one makes the other two much less useful.

  • Same number on all three
  • One index, in one place, listing every number
  • The index is the thing you back up first

An index is boring and is the only part that cannot be reconstructed. A sample can be recut and a photograph retaken, but the link between number 47 and a specific repair on a specific coat exists nowhere else.

Cold storage for the images

If the photographic part of the archive matters to you, cold helps. The National Park Service overview of cold storage for photograph collections states that cold storage greatly reduces the rate of deterioration and extends the longevity of photographic media, and that it can avert or postpone costly conservation treatment.

It defines the range in use as 0 to 55 degrees F with appropriate relative humidity, with cool rooms commonly at 55 to 65 degrees F and 30 to 40 percent relative humidity, and cold rooms below 55 degrees F.

The household version is a sealed container in a cool interior space, brought up to room temperature before opening so moisture does not condense on the contents.

What to discard

Unlabeled samples. Duplicate images of the same repair. Fabric that has degraded. Notes you cannot connect to anything. An archive that keeps everything becomes an archive nobody opens, which is functionally the same as not having one.

Review it once a year, at the same time as the supplies review, and keep only what supports the record of your own repairs.

Common questions

What ink should I use on labels?
A pigment ink rather than a dye ink, on card rather than directly on fabric. Dye inks fade and can migrate.
Can I write directly on the fabric sample?
Only on a seam allowance or an area you do not need. Ink on the sample changes the thing you are keeping as a reference.
How many samples is too many?
When you stop being able to find one in under a minute, the index has failed rather than the archive being too large.
Is a spreadsheet good enough as an index?
Yes, if it is backed up and exported to a plain format occasionally. The risk is the file, not the format.

More in Reviews

Latest from Technique Desk